French study: the vaxxed are magnetic!
Dr. Julien Devilléger's observational study, "Operation Secret 16", on magnetism in vaccinated people. Urban legend? You be the judge.
Article by Guy Boulianne, 9 August 2021, translated by Claire Edwards
(Original French text: https://guyboulianne.com/2021/08/09/letude-observationnelle-secret-16-sur-le-magnetisme-chez-les-vaccines/)
On May 14, 2021, I published an article entitled "How long will it take to convince the unbelievers that we are being run by psychopaths of the highest calibre?" in which I reported a COVID phenomenon involving people who report that when they apply a small magnet to the spot where they were injected with the "vaccine" (usually the upper arm), the magnet sticks. However, when they place the exact same magnet in a different part of their body, it does not stick and falls right off. I added to this article some serious scientific studies concerning, among others, the "Magneto" protein and the administration of superparamagnetic nanoparticles of a DNA vaccine.
This kind of article is often mocked and ridiculed by skeptics and "Fact Checkers", such as Dr. Joe Schwarcz PhD, director of the "Office for Science and Society" at McGill University (former MK Ultra research centre, let's not forget).
This kind of article is often mocked and ridiculed by skeptics and "Fact Checkers", such as Dr. Joe Schwarcz PhD, director of the "Office for Science and Society" at McGill University (former MK Ultra research centre, let's not forget).
|
However, many articles that were ahead of the curve compared to the general population are now confirmed by the disastrous events that the world population is currently experiencing and falling victim to (vaccine passport, loss of freedoms, side effects of vax, etc.). More and more politicians, media, doctors and scientists are admitting that the people warning about this were often right.
On 8 August, I received an e-mail from Dr. Julien Devilléger informing me of two studies that were published on the website of the International Association for Independent and Benevolent |
Dr Julien Devilléger,
|
Scientific Medicine (AIMSIB): "Hello Mr. Boulianne. I am a cardiologist in Charente (France). A study from Luxembourg and finally the Charente has just been published on AIMSIB.org (Wacssyn covid: the diabolical scandal is happening). The title is pretentious but at the same time, the subject (post-vaccination magnetism) is controversial++! Enjoy your reading and I look forward to hearing from you.” Dr. Julien Devilléger is a cardiologist at the La Rochefoucauld Hospital Centre in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region.
This story of post Covid-vaccination magnetization has been circulating on social networks for months, completely dismissed derisively by the official media. One day Amar Goudjil, Treasurer of EFVV-Luxembourg decided to evaluate this alleged phenomenon at the injection sites of 100 vaccinated people and to compare them to 100 non-vaccinated people. Then Dr Julien Devilléger, assisted by nurse Jessy Duthil, repeated the process on 75 vaccinated and 30 non-vaccinated people. Neither team claimed to be carrying out an epidemiological investigation worthy of the name, it was just a question of removing the doubt on a possible urban legend. In the end, a horrible surprise awaited our three investigators, and the French Medical Council was immediately informed.
The observational study "Operation Secret 16" carried out by Dr Devilléger aimed to study the magnetization of a one-euro coin in 75 patients vaccinated against Covid, in comparison with a control group of 30 unvaccinated persons. We found a much more frequent magnetization in vaccinated patients (35/75) compared to non-vaccinated patients (2/30), p = 0.0027. This magnetization is much more frequent in the case of Astra vaccination (17/28 vaccinated) compared to non-vaccinated (2/30), p = 0.0014.
This story of post Covid-vaccination magnetization has been circulating on social networks for months, completely dismissed derisively by the official media. One day Amar Goudjil, Treasurer of EFVV-Luxembourg decided to evaluate this alleged phenomenon at the injection sites of 100 vaccinated people and to compare them to 100 non-vaccinated people. Then Dr Julien Devilléger, assisted by nurse Jessy Duthil, repeated the process on 75 vaccinated and 30 non-vaccinated people. Neither team claimed to be carrying out an epidemiological investigation worthy of the name, it was just a question of removing the doubt on a possible urban legend. In the end, a horrible surprise awaited our three investigators, and the French Medical Council was immediately informed.
The observational study "Operation Secret 16" carried out by Dr Devilléger aimed to study the magnetization of a one-euro coin in 75 patients vaccinated against Covid, in comparison with a control group of 30 unvaccinated persons. We found a much more frequent magnetization in vaccinated patients (35/75) compared to non-vaccinated patients (2/30), p = 0.0027. This magnetization is much more frequent in the case of Astra vaccination (17/28 vaccinated) compared to non-vaccinated (2/30), p = 0.0014.
Dr. Joe Schwarcz is the director of the "Office for Science and Society" at McGill University, whose mission is to separate sense from nonsense. Is this man really serious?
|
1. Electromagnetism Study of Vaccinated Persons in Luxembourg
INTRODUCTION |
|
For the last few months, hundreds of amateur videos have been appearing all over social networks showing people who have visibly become electromagnetic following vaccination. After many questions were asked by a number of our members about this "supposed" electromagnetic effect appearing in vaccinated subjects, our association decided to take a concrete interest in this intriguing subject. In agreement with Jean-Pierre Eudier, our president, and Toni Fernandes, our coordinator in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, it was decided to conduct a field survey on this phenomenon.
This purely statistical and sociological investigation of this supposed electromagnetism effect, which is the subject of this article, raises at least three important questions:
1. Is it true that people show an electromagnetic effect after vaccination?
2. If so, is it true that only vaccinated individuals show this effect?
3. What is actually injected into individuals under the label of vaccine that causes this effect?
To try to answer these questions, the survey was entrusted to Mr. Amar GOUDJIL, treasurer of the association and member in charge of demographic and sociological issues.
PRESENTATION OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE SURVEY
For the purpose of rapid implementation, it was decided:
PRESENTATION OF THE APPROACH AND IMPLEMENTATION METHOD
SUMMARY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS FOR THE WEEK OF STUDY FROM 1 TO 5 JUNE, 2021
In the non-vaccinated group, out of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people showing attraction to the magnet was 0 (zero). The experiment therefore ended there for this group.
In the vaccinated group, on the other hand, out of the 30 individuals interviewed, 29 showed an attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adhered to their skin without difficulty.
Of these 29 individuals, 22 had the magnet adhering to only one shoulder and only to the injection site. These 22 individuals are those who received only one injection.
The other 7 people in this same group had the magnet adhering on both shoulders.
It seems that people who were vaccinated earlier in the government vaccination programme are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds better than in freshly vaccinated people.
Note: As the exercise was totally destabilizing for the respondents, at no time were they asked to apply the magnet to an area other than the shoulders. It would have been very interesting to know if the magnet also adhered to the neck, chest, forehead or leg areas, as well as to know if other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhered.
CONCLUSION
It appears that vaccinated individuals do indeed give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the stronger the field they give off. This sensation and assessment, which is based solely on tactile experience when the magnet is applied to and removed from the shoulder, should be verified much more precisely with much more accurate equipment.
It was extremely difficult to find individuals willing to participate in this extremely disorienting experience. People are interested in the experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the magnet clings to their skin, they become dubious at first, then suddenly they become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous, even completely in shock. They sincerely wonder how a magnet can adhere to their skin as easily as it adheres to a metal pole.
They ask for explanations and the investigator reassures them that there must be an explanation. They were referred back to the doctor who had advised them to get the injection. One woman even cried and told me that she did not want to be vaccinated but that she was forced to do so because her employer said she had to work with customers.
These are exactly the terms that came up frequently.
Again, a psychosocial investigation of the real motivations that led the vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected should be conducted. Ideally, all conversations with vaccinees should be recorded and videotaped and then analysed.
The investigation was prematurely stopped for reasons of conscience and morality because the investigator could no longer cope with the helplessness and confusion of people whose faces became petrified when they realized that they had been injected with a substance about which they knew nothing.
The interviewer, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past, was very uncomfortable with these people who were wondering what was happening to them. People became pale, white, nervous, put a hand to their forehead or crossed their arms and bit their bottom lip. Some sweated from their hands as they were observed wiping them on their hips or thighs. These effects and expressions generally occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or really measurable tension. For the interviewees, these uncontrolled physical manifestations were indicative of a deep malaise when they realized afterwards that they may have committed an irreparable act. The act of vaccination being an irreversible act.
To the question, "Is it true that people present an electromagnetic effect after having undergone at least one act of vaccination?", the answer is affirmative and yes, indeed, individuals do become electromagnetic at the injection site at least.
To the question, "What is injected into individuals that causes this effect?", we answer that it is up to the governments and authorities that guarantee the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question because they are the ones who took the serious executive decision to vaccinate the population.
We will not pronounce here on the responsibility of each party, but it is certain that if paramagnetic nanoparticles ("nanocarriers" or "magnetic beads") have gone into into the composition of these vaccines, it is likely that we could very quickly hear about an unprecedented health catastrophe. It is now up to toxicologists and pharmacologists to discover the origins and causes of these effects of attraction on vaccinated subjects and it is up to the guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country to very quickly ask for an investigation to be opened on the exact and true composition of these vaccines.
Synthesis and conclusion of the investigation work carried out by Amar GOUDJIL for European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance, Mamer, June 06, 2021.
This purely statistical and sociological investigation of this supposed electromagnetism effect, which is the subject of this article, raises at least three important questions:
1. Is it true that people show an electromagnetic effect after vaccination?
2. If so, is it true that only vaccinated individuals show this effect?
3. What is actually injected into individuals under the label of vaccine that causes this effect?
To try to answer these questions, the survey was entrusted to Mr. Amar GOUDJIL, treasurer of the association and member in charge of demographic and sociological issues.
PRESENTATION OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE SURVEY
For the purpose of rapid implementation, it was decided:
- To interview a panel of 200 individuals living or working in Luxembourg.
- That this panel would be divided into 2 groups. The first would be composed of 100 individuals vaccinated in Luxembourg and the second of 100 individuals not vaccinated for comparison purposes.
- That each of these groups should include 50 women and 50 men.
- Only active individuals would be selected to participate in the study because they are much more likely to be vaccinated than inactive individuals.
- That the location of the study would be the Belle-Étoile shopping centre and Arlon Street in Strassen.
- That the variables retained would therefore be sex, age, profession, number of injections, pharmaceutical origin of the injections, date of injections, magnetic attraction, emission-reception of an electric field and the city of the respondent's place of residence.
- It should also be noted that for reasons of practicality, only people wearing short-sleeved or sleeveless clothing would be interviewed.
PRESENTATION OF THE APPROACH AND IMPLEMENTATION METHOD
- The interviewer introduces himself or herself to the individuals, introduces the association and then introduces the survey: "Hello Sir or Madam, I apologize for bothering you but my name is Amar GOUDJIL, I work for the European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance (EFVV) and I am currently carrying out a statistical and anonymous survey on vaccinated and unvaccinated people living in Luxembourg" ... "It is a survey that deals with information specifying that vaccinated people present electromagnetic effects and we, at EFVV, are looking to find out what the observed reality is."
- The interviewer then asks the interviewees if they are willing to participate in the survey: "Would you please give me a few minutes and would you be interested in participating in our survey?
- The interviewer then explains to the respondents what the survey seeks to establish and introduces the individuals to the subject by presenting them with a magnet that adheres, by magnetic effect, to a metal object (post, car, etc.). He then explains that magnets do not adhere to humans and that they only adhere to metal objects, but that information has been received claiming that vaccinated people generate an attraction to the magnet because they have been vaccinated.
- The interviewer then asks the respondent if he or she is willing to play the game and apply the magnet to the spot where he or she was injected.
- When the magnet sticks to the skin on the shoulder, the interviewer then asks the respondent to stick the magnet on the other shoulder.
- The interviewer then asked the respondent if he or she would be willing to have an electric and magnetic field tester (Meterk brand, model MK54) put on the shoulders, explaining that information had also been reported to our association that vaccinated people also generate electric fields.
- The investigator continues the discussion and continues to answer, as far as possible, the questions of the interviewees who are interested in the experiment conducted and the results of the investigation.
SUMMARY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS FOR THE WEEK OF STUDY FROM 1 TO 5 JUNE, 2021
- Only 30 vaccinated and 30 unvaccinated persons were finally interviewed, whereas the objective was to interview 100 for the first group and 100 for the second.
- The condition of gender distribution was respected. In each group, 15 women and 15 men were interviewed.
In the non-vaccinated group, out of the 30 individuals interviewed, the number of people showing attraction to the magnet was 0 (zero). The experiment therefore ended there for this group.
In the vaccinated group, on the other hand, out of the 30 individuals interviewed, 29 showed an attraction to the magnet. That is, the magnet adhered to their skin without difficulty.
Of these 29 individuals, 22 had the magnet adhering to only one shoulder and only to the injection site. These 22 individuals are those who received only one injection.
The other 7 people in this same group had the magnet adhering on both shoulders.
- In this group of people living or working in Luxembourg, it appears that:
- 17 received at least one injection from Pfizer
- 7 received at least one injection from AstraZeneca
- 3 received at least one injection from Moderna
- 3 received the single injection from Johnson & Johnson
- 6 received both Pfizer injections
- 1 received the 2 injections from AstraZeneca
- 1 received the 2 injections from Moderna
- Two of the individuals in this group, a nurse working at the CHL who was one of the first to be vaccinated, and a financial analyst, showed totally abnormal electric field emissions. In the case of the nurse, a video was even made showing the values emitted by the tester around the left shoulder. For the analyst, the values emitted by the tester were approximately the same, but the individual abruptly ended his participation.
- Of the 30 respondents in the vaccinated group, 29 live or work in Strassen. Only 1 lives in Metz but works in Strassen.
It seems that people who were vaccinated earlier in the government vaccination programme are much more electromagnetic than people who were vaccinated more recently. The magnet adheres faster and holds better than in freshly vaccinated people.
- More precise measurements should be taken in relation to this last finding.
Note: As the exercise was totally destabilizing for the respondents, at no time were they asked to apply the magnet to an area other than the shoulders. It would have been very interesting to know if the magnet also adhered to the neck, chest, forehead or leg areas, as well as to know if other objects such as spoons, scissors and smartphones also adhered.
CONCLUSION
It appears that vaccinated individuals do indeed give off an electromagnetic field and that the earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the stronger the field they give off. This sensation and assessment, which is based solely on tactile experience when the magnet is applied to and removed from the shoulder, should be verified much more precisely with much more accurate equipment.
It was extremely difficult to find individuals willing to participate in this extremely disorienting experience. People are interested in the experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the magnet clings to their skin, they become dubious at first, then suddenly they become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous, even completely in shock. They sincerely wonder how a magnet can adhere to their skin as easily as it adheres to a metal pole.
They ask for explanations and the investigator reassures them that there must be an explanation. They were referred back to the doctor who had advised them to get the injection. One woman even cried and told me that she did not want to be vaccinated but that she was forced to do so because her employer said she had to work with customers.
- In the discussions, it emerged that people do not even get vaccinated for medical or health reasons, out of belief in or fear of the disease, but often in the hope of returning to a normal life and being able to travel freely again.
- During the exchanges, people clearly express their dismay by saying, afterwards, that they were coerced. Many recognize that this injection is non-consensual and that at no time were they given rational explanations, even if only from the point of view of the benefit-risk ratio. They then describe, after reflection and discussion, this act as: "mistake, madness, an escape route, solution, or even blackmail".
These are exactly the terms that came up frequently.
Again, a psychosocial investigation of the real motivations that led the vaccinated individuals to agree to be injected should be conducted. Ideally, all conversations with vaccinees should be recorded and videotaped and then analysed.
The investigation was prematurely stopped for reasons of conscience and morality because the investigator could no longer cope with the helplessness and confusion of people whose faces became petrified when they realized that they had been injected with a substance about which they knew nothing.
The interviewer, who has studied management techniques and psychosociology in the past, was very uncomfortable with these people who were wondering what was happening to them. People became pale, white, nervous, put a hand to their forehead or crossed their arms and bit their bottom lip. Some sweated from their hands as they were observed wiping them on their hips or thighs. These effects and expressions generally occur in states of anxiety, extreme stress or really measurable tension. For the interviewees, these uncontrolled physical manifestations were indicative of a deep malaise when they realized afterwards that they may have committed an irreparable act. The act of vaccination being an irreversible act.
To the question, "Is it true that people present an electromagnetic effect after having undergone at least one act of vaccination?", the answer is affirmative and yes, indeed, individuals do become electromagnetic at the injection site at least.
To the question, "What is injected into individuals that causes this effect?", we answer that it is up to the governments and authorities that guarantee the health of Luxembourgers to answer this question because they are the ones who took the serious executive decision to vaccinate the population.
We will not pronounce here on the responsibility of each party, but it is certain that if paramagnetic nanoparticles ("nanocarriers" or "magnetic beads") have gone into into the composition of these vaccines, it is likely that we could very quickly hear about an unprecedented health catastrophe. It is now up to toxicologists and pharmacologists to discover the origins and causes of these effects of attraction on vaccinated subjects and it is up to the guarantors of the health of the citizens of this country to very quickly ask for an investigation to be opened on the exact and true composition of these vaccines.
Synthesis and conclusion of the investigation work carried out by Amar GOUDJIL for European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance, Mamer, June 06, 2021.
|
2. “Operation Secret 16" Study
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY For several months, Internet users have been trying to demonstrate a magnetism linked to the vaccine ("Magnet challenge"), with diverse objects (telephones, keys, scissors, spoons, etc.) being stuck on various areas of the anatomy such as arms, forehead, torso, back! |
|
Only one observational study (see above) has been conducted in a serious way in Luxembourg, finding a magnetization in 29/30 vaccinated persons who participated in the test, but no magnetization in the 30 non-vaccinated persons who participated in the magnet test.
Other field experiments found comparable results or, on the contrary, no magnetization in vaccinated people, but the population studied involved groups of a few people.
The "Secret 16" observational study, carried out by a cardiologist and a nurse from Charente (France), aimed to study the magnetization of a one-euro coin in 75 patients vaccinated against Covid, in comparison with a control group of 30 non-vaccinated persons.
The study found a much more frequent magnetization of the coin in vaccinated patients (35/75) compared to non-vaccinated patients (2/30), p=0.0027. This magnetization is much more frequent in the case of Astra vaccination (17/28 vaccinated) compared to the non-vaccinated (2/30), p=0.0014.
POPULATION AND METHODS
Researchers: Dr Julien DEVILLEGER, cardiologist and Jessy Duthil, private nurse (Charente, France) from June 11 to July 27, 2021
Statistics: Fisher test (Biostat TGV software)
Magnetization research method:
- Coin held between thumb and index finger, with middle finger bent (safely).
- Person standing, arms swinging, dry skin, little hair on the arms, cream cleaned off with water, then skin dried, sweat absorbed by single-use dry towel.
- Coin held at 20 centimetres below the shoulder, lightly touching the skin, without pressing, and sliding from bottom to top up to about 3 finger-widths below the shoulder.
- Technique to be carried out 2 times in a row, in case of magnetization alternately on the left arm/right arm.
- Magnetization if the coin held for at least 10 seconds
RESULTS
Covid unvaccinated group, 2/30 had coin adhesion >10 seconds.
Covid vaccinated group, 35/75 demonstrated coin magnetization at the injection site, and 10 had bilateral magnetization.
Note that in case of bilateral magnetization, the magnetizable area was about 10-15 centimetres wide on the vaccinated side, and about half on the other arm.
Detail according to vaccines:
- 12/33 Pfizer (1/3 with one dose) magnetized the coin
- 17/28 AstraZeneca (2 doses)
- 4/10 Moderna (2 doses)
- 1/2 Johnson&Johnson
- 1/2 half Astra, half Pfizer, 100% hybrid
DISCUSSION AND REMARKS
This study shows a statistically significant difference in magnetization in vaccinated patients (43.3% vs 6.7% p=0.0014)
This magnetization seems to be more frequent in Astra vaccinees (60.7% vs 38.7%), but without statistical significance (p=0.37), due to the sample size.
It is much more often bilateral in the case of Astra vaccination (28.6%) than with the other vaccines (3.5%), p=0.016.
It was quickly found that the first Pfizer vaccinees were not magnetized, unlike the recent Pfizer vaccinees.
Even if the research for post-vaccination magnetism is simple, it is important to do this research under rigorous conditions, to avoid false magnetizations (cream, sebum+++). Half of the patients tested by Dr. J. Devilléger were tested without prior knowledge of their vaccination status and, in the case of vaccination, without knowing the side of it. Out of 27 patients who magnetized, he found the right side 25 times, and 2 times he was wrong (case of bilateral magnetization).
Other experiments:
- ferrite magnet: does not work, only used to show that the one euro coin is magnetizable.
- neodymium magnet: very difficult to take off, one magnet broke in 2, these products are dangerous to handle
- RFID reader: 0/12 on vaccinees (5 magnetized), while the reader works on chipped dogs.
- UV lamp: RAS [?]
- magnetometer (Phyphox): no significant variation of the magnetic field
CONCLUSION
These results confirm those found in the Luxembourg study, with a very significant difference in magnetization between vaccinated and non-vaccinated, and magnetization is more frequent and especially more often bilateral in the case of Astra vaccination.
All the vaccines used seem to be involved in this phenomenon.
This should make us wonder about the composition of the vaccines used, in order to better appreciate the possible risks of magnetic interactions, especially in the case of scheduled MRI (the latest 7-Tesla MRI +++). [See also warning from Dr. T at Not on the Beeb, who has also become aware of this and is warning doctors not to put patients suffering from Covid vaccine adverse effects into MRI machines because they will kill them.]
Dr Julien Devilléger
Jessy Duthil, nurse - July 2021
Other field experiments found comparable results or, on the contrary, no magnetization in vaccinated people, but the population studied involved groups of a few people.
The "Secret 16" observational study, carried out by a cardiologist and a nurse from Charente (France), aimed to study the magnetization of a one-euro coin in 75 patients vaccinated against Covid, in comparison with a control group of 30 non-vaccinated persons.
The study found a much more frequent magnetization of the coin in vaccinated patients (35/75) compared to non-vaccinated patients (2/30), p=0.0027. This magnetization is much more frequent in the case of Astra vaccination (17/28 vaccinated) compared to the non-vaccinated (2/30), p=0.0014.
POPULATION AND METHODS
Researchers: Dr Julien DEVILLEGER, cardiologist and Jessy Duthil, private nurse (Charente, France) from June 11 to July 27, 2021
Statistics: Fisher test (Biostat TGV software)
Magnetization research method:
- Coin held between thumb and index finger, with middle finger bent (safely).
- Person standing, arms swinging, dry skin, little hair on the arms, cream cleaned off with water, then skin dried, sweat absorbed by single-use dry towel.
- Coin held at 20 centimetres below the shoulder, lightly touching the skin, without pressing, and sliding from bottom to top up to about 3 finger-widths below the shoulder.
- Technique to be carried out 2 times in a row, in case of magnetization alternately on the left arm/right arm.
- Magnetization if the coin held for at least 10 seconds
RESULTS
Covid unvaccinated group, 2/30 had coin adhesion >10 seconds.
Covid vaccinated group, 35/75 demonstrated coin magnetization at the injection site, and 10 had bilateral magnetization.
Note that in case of bilateral magnetization, the magnetizable area was about 10-15 centimetres wide on the vaccinated side, and about half on the other arm.
Detail according to vaccines:
- 12/33 Pfizer (1/3 with one dose) magnetized the coin
- 17/28 AstraZeneca (2 doses)
- 4/10 Moderna (2 doses)
- 1/2 Johnson&Johnson
- 1/2 half Astra, half Pfizer, 100% hybrid
DISCUSSION AND REMARKS
This study shows a statistically significant difference in magnetization in vaccinated patients (43.3% vs 6.7% p=0.0014)
This magnetization seems to be more frequent in Astra vaccinees (60.7% vs 38.7%), but without statistical significance (p=0.37), due to the sample size.
It is much more often bilateral in the case of Astra vaccination (28.6%) than with the other vaccines (3.5%), p=0.016.
It was quickly found that the first Pfizer vaccinees were not magnetized, unlike the recent Pfizer vaccinees.
Even if the research for post-vaccination magnetism is simple, it is important to do this research under rigorous conditions, to avoid false magnetizations (cream, sebum+++). Half of the patients tested by Dr. J. Devilléger were tested without prior knowledge of their vaccination status and, in the case of vaccination, without knowing the side of it. Out of 27 patients who magnetized, he found the right side 25 times, and 2 times he was wrong (case of bilateral magnetization).
Other experiments:
- ferrite magnet: does not work, only used to show that the one euro coin is magnetizable.
- neodymium magnet: very difficult to take off, one magnet broke in 2, these products are dangerous to handle
- RFID reader: 0/12 on vaccinees (5 magnetized), while the reader works on chipped dogs.
- UV lamp: RAS [?]
- magnetometer (Phyphox): no significant variation of the magnetic field
CONCLUSION
These results confirm those found in the Luxembourg study, with a very significant difference in magnetization between vaccinated and non-vaccinated, and magnetization is more frequent and especially more often bilateral in the case of Astra vaccination.
All the vaccines used seem to be involved in this phenomenon.
This should make us wonder about the composition of the vaccines used, in order to better appreciate the possible risks of magnetic interactions, especially in the case of scheduled MRI (the latest 7-Tesla MRI +++). [See also warning from Dr. T at Not on the Beeb, who has also become aware of this and is warning doctors not to put patients suffering from Covid vaccine adverse effects into MRI machines because they will kill them.]
Dr Julien Devilléger
Jessy Duthil, nurse - July 2021
