Nanoparticles polluting vaccines - Stefano Montanari & Antonietta Gatti
Interview with Surêté Vaccins (2018)
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti, Stefano Montanari
http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php
Abstract
Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.
Antonietta M Gatti, Stefano Montanari
http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.php
Abstract
Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.
Background
In early March 2018, the Italian police raided the home and science laboratory of Drs. Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. The police snatched all of the digital assets owned by the husband and wife team of nanopathologists, grabbing laptops, computers, and flash-drives—and with it, years of work and research.
Because Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and nanoparticles, from in-vivo (performed in a living organism) and in-vitro (performed in a test tube) to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.
(Thanks to Children's Health Defense)
In early March 2018, the Italian police raided the home and science laboratory of Drs. Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. The police snatched all of the digital assets owned by the husband and wife team of nanopathologists, grabbing laptops, computers, and flash-drives—and with it, years of work and research.
Because Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and nanoparticles, from in-vivo (performed in a living organism) and in-vitro (performed in a test tube) to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.
(Thanks to Children's Health Defense)
Interviewer
Good evening. We are discussing vaccine safety this evening. So we would just like to address this question: Are there any reasons, any concerns regarding vaccine safety? And we will address this with two scientists whom I'm welcoming here tonight. Mr. Stefano Montanari from Italy and Mrs. Antonietta Gatti. They are both researchers in nano-diagnostics and they have just published a new paper on vaccines in the Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination. I will ask now: what are your recent findings are about nanoparticles?
Stefano Montanari
Before starting, it's important to understand what particles are. Particles we are looking for in vaccines but not only there. Back in the 1990s, my wife and I discovered that micro-nanoparticles, i.e. small pieces of matter, already known to be present in the atmosphere and in the environment, could enter the human body, the human organism and be responsible for a lot of diseases, which we called nano-pathologies. “Nano” because of “nano” matter: nanoparticles. Those particles are produced by waste incinerators, car traffic, heating, lots of procedures. A lot of processes that involve mainly high temperatures, not only, but mainly. Those particles can enter the body through inhalation, and through ingestion mainly.
I mean, they float in the air – because they are very, very small, very thin, very tiny. You can inhale them and they enter your lungs down to the alveoli, which is the innermost part of the lungs. Once they are there, they can enter the blood. And in the blood they can be responsible for blood coagulation. They form blood clots. Those clots, if they are in the vein, go directly to the lungs and become the cause of pulmonary thromboembolism. If they are in the arteries, they can go everywhere, mainly in the brain or in the heart – mainly, but not only. But that happens only in a small percentage of people, around 10% of people, who don't have some chemicals in their organism, their bodies. Most people …
Interviewer
Can I ask you a question? Is this maybe the kind of issues that we also see when we talk about global warming and the pollution of the atmosphere?
Stefano Montanari
Pollution, yes. Slightly different. Pollution is one thing, and the global warming is something different, but in some instances, they have the same origin because pollution involves the production of a lot of CO2, for example, or methane or other gases that are responsible for the greenhouse effect. The particles we deal with are part of that pollution but they are not a gas; they are solid matter. They are very, very small, very thin, very light. They float in the air so they can enter the body through inhalation, through respiration, or they can be ingested because they fall on, for example, vegetables, animals eat them and those particles enter their muscles. The muscles are meat so we eat animals that are polluted.
So those particles can be carried by the blood everywhere, in every part of the body. Once they are there, they are captured by the various tissues, and those tissues cannot eliminate them, cannot get rid of them. So once they are there they are surrounded by another kind of tissue, an inflammatory tissue, and that tissue stays there forever. Forever because those particles are, in a way, eternal. They cannot be reduced, cannot be transformed into other things so they stay there forever.
Depending on where those particles go, they can cause different diseases, different pathologies. For example, when they reach the liver, they can cause an inflammation of the liver and, in the long run, that inflammation becomes a cancer. Always. It takes time, maybe some months. For example, in soldiers, they inhale a lot of dust because of explosions, cancer may take a few months. In normal people, it may take years or even decades.
Interviewer
Your research now, it's not on the diseases but first on where we find these particles.
Stefano Montanari
But they deal with the diseases because we, or my wife, she developed a system using an electron microscope to detect those particles inside the body. I mean, we take biopsy samples, for example, of a cancer, and we look inside those tissues and discover if there are those micro-nanoparticles. We know that those particles can induce cancer, also because we have done experiments on rats in the past. But those particles are not only responsible for cancer, but also, for example, if they go to the pancreas, they can cause diabetes because you don't produce insulin anymore. If they go to the brain – that’s important with vaccines – they can induce some neurological disease, depending on the spot of the brain where they end their trajectory (their trip).
Interviewer
Can you just specify now this specific research that that you just published, what the new findings are, because tomorrow we will have the full explanation …
Stefano Montanari
What's important to understand is that those particles can induce diseases, and also neurological ones. So about 15 years ago, we started to analyse vaccines. At the beginning it was the German University of Mainz that gave us some samples of vaccines because they wanted us to analyse them because those vaccines produced some problems for people who had those vaccines injected. So they wanted to know why.
And we discovered that both the vaccine and the tissue, which was which was hit by the particles contained in the vaccines – because we discovered that those vaccines were polluted by particles. Those particles were contained equally in the vaccine and in the tissues. So we started to analyse vaccines. And after a while, an Italian university, the University of Padua, sent us a student for her thesis and we analysed different vaccines with her, finding a lot of them polluted by micro and nanoparticles then we went on analysing them. And now we have analysed about 30 vaccines, with many samples of each vaccine, and we discovered that they were all polluted, all but – with a single exception, and that exception was the sole veterinary vaccine, animal vaccine which we had analysed. The only one which was clean, without anything inside.
So that's pretty surprising …
Interviewer
So it’s possible to have one without [nanoparticles]?
Stefano Montanari
It’s absolutely possible so …
Interviewer:
Ok so it's technological. There are bound to be nanoparticles everywhere.
Stefano Montanari
From the technological point of view is absolutely possible because if you make vaccine for cats clean, you can make it possible for humans, too.
Interviewer
Can you name a few of these nanoparticles?
Stefano Montanari
Well, it’s important to understand that it's not so much what the particles are made of which is critical, but it's the fact that those particles are foreign bodies. So the human tissues react against those particles. Not much because they contain iron, titanium, tungsten, lead – those are elements which we found in all those particles. But because they are foreign bodies. Those foreign bodies, those particles are like a bullet. If I shoot somebody, that bullet makes a hole in the heart. It's not so important if the bullet was made of stainless-steel, or titanium, or iron or whatever. What’s important is that they punched a hole in the heart.
Interviewer:
So if I understand it well, it's also the way they enter the body?
Stefano Montanari
Not the way. It’s because that particle is something that the body does not recognize as self.
Interviewer
Because we breathe all these things all the time. What is the trouble then with vaccines?
Stefano Montanari
There is one big difference. First, when you breathe, you inhale air containing particles. But when you exhale that air, you exhale 99.999% of what you inhale. So if your lungs are healthy, you exhale the vast majority of the particles you inhale. If you eat them, if you ingest them, then you go – after some hours of some days – you go tithe bathroom and you get rid of them. 99.999%. But if you inject them, they all stay inside your body. All. And there is another thing to be kept in mind, that vaccines contain a lot of other substances that can act – that can help the particles to cause diseases, to trigger those diseases. So it's a very poisonous cocktail of things.
Antonietta Gatti
I wanted to underline that we developed a new technique of investigation and we applied this technique to vaccines. It is a fluid, of course. So we analysed a few drops of a vaccine deposited on a filter. And we verified that there was a presence of organic matter, viruses, proteins and so on. But among this substrate, we identified also inorganic matter. For instance, aluminium salts that the manufacturer declares to have added to a vaccine. And among these aluminium salts, we identified different particles, also nanoparticles. Mostly they were metals. And we suppose that these small particles belonged to some processes of manufacture. Probably is only a hypothesis because we had not the possibility to go inside and to verify every step of production. So we suppose that some filter released the, for instance, silicon zirconium or silicates, or also barium sulfate particles. It was very strange to find stainless steel, it is the stainless steel that they use every day. It is an alloy of iron chromium and nickel.
Interviewer
So do you think it's all from manufacturing processes, maybe?
Antonietta Gatti
Yes, I suppose for instance, in the case of tungsten carbide[i] nanoparticle we find. We suppose that they used some special plates to work as a needle, the mechanical needle. And some debris was released and they were on the surface of the needle or inside the needle and of course they were injected together with the vaccine. There is another important evidence that we had. The interaction of these foreign bodies with the organic part of the vaccines. So they formed aggregates: the core is the particle and the outside there is a coating of organic matter. But these interactions and these agglomerates [inaudible] So it remains inside and, after injection, it is dispersed through the blood circulation in all the body. If it remains under the derma, of course concentrated, under the derma [skin], probably it can induce granuloma and so on. But when it is displaced, it can reach all the areas of the body, the brain …
Interviewer
So sorry I am interrupting you because I think we will have a full explanation tomorrow again. So if I get it, well, you have this new technique, these new findings on the nanoparticles. They can interact with the viruses and the live organic matter in the injection and they will interact on the body differently. So it raises – it doesn’t prove so far directly what consequences there can be. It’s not linked – if I get it well – to a specific disease, but it raises a new question.
Antonietta Gatti
New question. Nobody verified the biocompatibility of these new aggregates is a key point.
Interviewer
So that’s new finding we would like to expose.
Stefano Montanari
One thing to add. First, those things are not allowed to be there. I mean, nanoparticles cannot be in any injectable solution. It’s forbidden. They can't be there. They may not be there. Second, the technique we use is not something that we invented overnight. It is something that my wife developed when we started many years ago studying nano pathologies. And then, while she was in charge of two European research projects. We worked with, for example, the University of Cambridge, with the University of Mainz in Germany, we worked with some French companies. So it's not something that we invented overnight. It's something that is scientifically solid.
[i] Tungsten carbide is a chemical compound containing equal parts of tungsten and carbon atoms. In its most basic form, tungsten carbide is a fine grey powder, but it can be pressed and formed into shapes through a process called sintering for use in industrial machinery, cutting tools, abrasives, armor-piercing shells and jewellery. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten_carbide
Toxicological Information
NIOSH Toxicity Data
DNA Damage leukocyte/human 10 mg/L September 2013
Acute Toxicity Data intratracheal/rat lowest published toxic dose: 200 mg/kg
Lung, Thorax, or Respiration: Fibrosis, focal (pneumoconiosis) September 2013
Tungsten carbide reacts violently with F2, ClF3, IF5, PbO2, NO2 and N2O (oxidants). It is readily attacked by a nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid mixture. May ignite in cold fluorine. (NTP, 1992).
National Toxicology Program, Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NTP). …Tungsten carbide burns with incandescence if heated to dull redness in either nitrous oxide or nitrogen dioxide.
Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. Flammable Solid
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Tungsten-carbide#section=Hazardous-Reactivities-and-Incompatibilities
Good evening. We are discussing vaccine safety this evening. So we would just like to address this question: Are there any reasons, any concerns regarding vaccine safety? And we will address this with two scientists whom I'm welcoming here tonight. Mr. Stefano Montanari from Italy and Mrs. Antonietta Gatti. They are both researchers in nano-diagnostics and they have just published a new paper on vaccines in the Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination. I will ask now: what are your recent findings are about nanoparticles?
Stefano Montanari
Before starting, it's important to understand what particles are. Particles we are looking for in vaccines but not only there. Back in the 1990s, my wife and I discovered that micro-nanoparticles, i.e. small pieces of matter, already known to be present in the atmosphere and in the environment, could enter the human body, the human organism and be responsible for a lot of diseases, which we called nano-pathologies. “Nano” because of “nano” matter: nanoparticles. Those particles are produced by waste incinerators, car traffic, heating, lots of procedures. A lot of processes that involve mainly high temperatures, not only, but mainly. Those particles can enter the body through inhalation, and through ingestion mainly.
I mean, they float in the air – because they are very, very small, very thin, very tiny. You can inhale them and they enter your lungs down to the alveoli, which is the innermost part of the lungs. Once they are there, they can enter the blood. And in the blood they can be responsible for blood coagulation. They form blood clots. Those clots, if they are in the vein, go directly to the lungs and become the cause of pulmonary thromboembolism. If they are in the arteries, they can go everywhere, mainly in the brain or in the heart – mainly, but not only. But that happens only in a small percentage of people, around 10% of people, who don't have some chemicals in their organism, their bodies. Most people …
Interviewer
Can I ask you a question? Is this maybe the kind of issues that we also see when we talk about global warming and the pollution of the atmosphere?
Stefano Montanari
Pollution, yes. Slightly different. Pollution is one thing, and the global warming is something different, but in some instances, they have the same origin because pollution involves the production of a lot of CO2, for example, or methane or other gases that are responsible for the greenhouse effect. The particles we deal with are part of that pollution but they are not a gas; they are solid matter. They are very, very small, very thin, very light. They float in the air so they can enter the body through inhalation, through respiration, or they can be ingested because they fall on, for example, vegetables, animals eat them and those particles enter their muscles. The muscles are meat so we eat animals that are polluted.
So those particles can be carried by the blood everywhere, in every part of the body. Once they are there, they are captured by the various tissues, and those tissues cannot eliminate them, cannot get rid of them. So once they are there they are surrounded by another kind of tissue, an inflammatory tissue, and that tissue stays there forever. Forever because those particles are, in a way, eternal. They cannot be reduced, cannot be transformed into other things so they stay there forever.
Depending on where those particles go, they can cause different diseases, different pathologies. For example, when they reach the liver, they can cause an inflammation of the liver and, in the long run, that inflammation becomes a cancer. Always. It takes time, maybe some months. For example, in soldiers, they inhale a lot of dust because of explosions, cancer may take a few months. In normal people, it may take years or even decades.
Interviewer
Your research now, it's not on the diseases but first on where we find these particles.
Stefano Montanari
But they deal with the diseases because we, or my wife, she developed a system using an electron microscope to detect those particles inside the body. I mean, we take biopsy samples, for example, of a cancer, and we look inside those tissues and discover if there are those micro-nanoparticles. We know that those particles can induce cancer, also because we have done experiments on rats in the past. But those particles are not only responsible for cancer, but also, for example, if they go to the pancreas, they can cause diabetes because you don't produce insulin anymore. If they go to the brain – that’s important with vaccines – they can induce some neurological disease, depending on the spot of the brain where they end their trajectory (their trip).
Interviewer
Can you just specify now this specific research that that you just published, what the new findings are, because tomorrow we will have the full explanation …
Stefano Montanari
What's important to understand is that those particles can induce diseases, and also neurological ones. So about 15 years ago, we started to analyse vaccines. At the beginning it was the German University of Mainz that gave us some samples of vaccines because they wanted us to analyse them because those vaccines produced some problems for people who had those vaccines injected. So they wanted to know why.
And we discovered that both the vaccine and the tissue, which was which was hit by the particles contained in the vaccines – because we discovered that those vaccines were polluted by particles. Those particles were contained equally in the vaccine and in the tissues. So we started to analyse vaccines. And after a while, an Italian university, the University of Padua, sent us a student for her thesis and we analysed different vaccines with her, finding a lot of them polluted by micro and nanoparticles then we went on analysing them. And now we have analysed about 30 vaccines, with many samples of each vaccine, and we discovered that they were all polluted, all but – with a single exception, and that exception was the sole veterinary vaccine, animal vaccine which we had analysed. The only one which was clean, without anything inside.
So that's pretty surprising …
Interviewer
So it’s possible to have one without [nanoparticles]?
Stefano Montanari
It’s absolutely possible so …
Interviewer:
Ok so it's technological. There are bound to be nanoparticles everywhere.
Stefano Montanari
From the technological point of view is absolutely possible because if you make vaccine for cats clean, you can make it possible for humans, too.
Interviewer
Can you name a few of these nanoparticles?
Stefano Montanari
Well, it’s important to understand that it's not so much what the particles are made of which is critical, but it's the fact that those particles are foreign bodies. So the human tissues react against those particles. Not much because they contain iron, titanium, tungsten, lead – those are elements which we found in all those particles. But because they are foreign bodies. Those foreign bodies, those particles are like a bullet. If I shoot somebody, that bullet makes a hole in the heart. It's not so important if the bullet was made of stainless-steel, or titanium, or iron or whatever. What’s important is that they punched a hole in the heart.
Interviewer:
So if I understand it well, it's also the way they enter the body?
Stefano Montanari
Not the way. It’s because that particle is something that the body does not recognize as self.
Interviewer
Because we breathe all these things all the time. What is the trouble then with vaccines?
Stefano Montanari
There is one big difference. First, when you breathe, you inhale air containing particles. But when you exhale that air, you exhale 99.999% of what you inhale. So if your lungs are healthy, you exhale the vast majority of the particles you inhale. If you eat them, if you ingest them, then you go – after some hours of some days – you go tithe bathroom and you get rid of them. 99.999%. But if you inject them, they all stay inside your body. All. And there is another thing to be kept in mind, that vaccines contain a lot of other substances that can act – that can help the particles to cause diseases, to trigger those diseases. So it's a very poisonous cocktail of things.
Antonietta Gatti
I wanted to underline that we developed a new technique of investigation and we applied this technique to vaccines. It is a fluid, of course. So we analysed a few drops of a vaccine deposited on a filter. And we verified that there was a presence of organic matter, viruses, proteins and so on. But among this substrate, we identified also inorganic matter. For instance, aluminium salts that the manufacturer declares to have added to a vaccine. And among these aluminium salts, we identified different particles, also nanoparticles. Mostly they were metals. And we suppose that these small particles belonged to some processes of manufacture. Probably is only a hypothesis because we had not the possibility to go inside and to verify every step of production. So we suppose that some filter released the, for instance, silicon zirconium or silicates, or also barium sulfate particles. It was very strange to find stainless steel, it is the stainless steel that they use every day. It is an alloy of iron chromium and nickel.
Interviewer
So do you think it's all from manufacturing processes, maybe?
Antonietta Gatti
Yes, I suppose for instance, in the case of tungsten carbide[i] nanoparticle we find. We suppose that they used some special plates to work as a needle, the mechanical needle. And some debris was released and they were on the surface of the needle or inside the needle and of course they were injected together with the vaccine. There is another important evidence that we had. The interaction of these foreign bodies with the organic part of the vaccines. So they formed aggregates: the core is the particle and the outside there is a coating of organic matter. But these interactions and these agglomerates [inaudible] So it remains inside and, after injection, it is dispersed through the blood circulation in all the body. If it remains under the derma, of course concentrated, under the derma [skin], probably it can induce granuloma and so on. But when it is displaced, it can reach all the areas of the body, the brain …
Interviewer
So sorry I am interrupting you because I think we will have a full explanation tomorrow again. So if I get it, well, you have this new technique, these new findings on the nanoparticles. They can interact with the viruses and the live organic matter in the injection and they will interact on the body differently. So it raises – it doesn’t prove so far directly what consequences there can be. It’s not linked – if I get it well – to a specific disease, but it raises a new question.
Antonietta Gatti
New question. Nobody verified the biocompatibility of these new aggregates is a key point.
Interviewer
So that’s new finding we would like to expose.
Stefano Montanari
One thing to add. First, those things are not allowed to be there. I mean, nanoparticles cannot be in any injectable solution. It’s forbidden. They can't be there. They may not be there. Second, the technique we use is not something that we invented overnight. It is something that my wife developed when we started many years ago studying nano pathologies. And then, while she was in charge of two European research projects. We worked with, for example, the University of Cambridge, with the University of Mainz in Germany, we worked with some French companies. So it's not something that we invented overnight. It's something that is scientifically solid.
[i] Tungsten carbide is a chemical compound containing equal parts of tungsten and carbon atoms. In its most basic form, tungsten carbide is a fine grey powder, but it can be pressed and formed into shapes through a process called sintering for use in industrial machinery, cutting tools, abrasives, armor-piercing shells and jewellery. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungsten_carbide
Toxicological Information
NIOSH Toxicity Data
DNA Damage leukocyte/human 10 mg/L September 2013
Acute Toxicity Data intratracheal/rat lowest published toxic dose: 200 mg/kg
Lung, Thorax, or Respiration: Fibrosis, focal (pneumoconiosis) September 2013
Tungsten carbide reacts violently with F2, ClF3, IF5, PbO2, NO2 and N2O (oxidants). It is readily attacked by a nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid mixture. May ignite in cold fluorine. (NTP, 1992).
National Toxicology Program, Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NTP). …Tungsten carbide burns with incandescence if heated to dull redness in either nitrous oxide or nitrogen dioxide.
Fire Protection Guide to Hazardous Materials. Flammable Solid
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Tungsten-carbide#section=Hazardous-Reactivities-and-Incompatibilities
